Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: One NIC on public side
From: "mike () grounded net" <mike () grounded net>
Date: Sat, 15 May 2010 09:46:08 -0500
Using a hub does not cause packet loss due to collisions. Half duplex Ethernet was designed to deal with collisions.
We didn't see any losses that we know of. Our voip traffic would probably have shown something was up. My original post was asking about putting nic1 on that hub, which would be a public connection at that point. I did as suggested, taking all protocols off of the nic but that ends up showing no traffic what so ever. Something is still not right.
Sincerely, Richard On 5/13/10, Boonie <newsboonie () gmail com> wrote:So, disabling some of these protocols will allow me to safely connect it on the public side again then?Without IP, I do not see how these other protocols will reach another machine. But, just disable all of them. Are you sure you want tu run all traffic through a hub? This might lead to packetloss due to colissions. Dave ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Re: One NIC on public side, (continued)
- Re: One NIC on public side mike () grounded net (May 13)
- Re: One NIC on public side mike () grounded net (May 13)
- Re: One NIC on public side mike () grounded net (May 13)
- Re: One NIC on public side Boonie (May 13)
- Re: One NIC on public side mike () grounded net (May 13)
- Re: One NIC on public side Boonie (May 13)
- Re: One NIC on public side mike () grounded net (May 13)
- Re: One NIC on public side mike () grounded net (May 13)
- Re: One NIC on public side Kevin Cullimore (May 15)
- Re: One NIC on public side Richard Bejtlich (May 15)
- Re: One NIC on public side mike () grounded net (May 15)
- Re: One NIC on public side Boonie (May 16)
- Re: One NIC on public side mike () grounded net (May 19)
- Re: One NIC on public side Martin Visser (May 16)
- Re: One NIC on public side Richard Bejtlich (May 17)
- Re: One NIC on public side mike () grounded net (May 19)
- Re: One NIC on public side Marc Luethi (May 19)
- Re: One NIC on public side mike () grounded net (May 19)
- Re: One NIC on public side mike () grounded net (May 19)