tcpdump mailing list archives
Re: Official patches for CVE-2014-8767/CVE-2014-8768/CVE-2014-8769?
From: Michal Sekletar <msekleta () redhat com>
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2014 18:43:03 +0100
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 03:43:21PM +0100, Michal Sekletar wrote:
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 09:52:59AM +0100, Romain Francoise wrote:On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 11:26:06AM -0800, Michal Zalewski wrote:I didn't request one, but probably. RH or Debian folks can likely just assign one from their pools.I can ask the Debian security team to assign one, or we can ask cve-assign@mitre directly. Or perhaps the other Michal can get one via internal Red Hat channels?I will contact Red Hat SRT to look into that.
I got a response from a member of Red Hat's SRT stating that since the issue was already reported publicly they can not assign CVE number. If we want to request CVE number we should either write to oss-security list or ask MITRE directly. Michal
Michal-- Romain Francoise <rfrancoise () debian org> http://people.debian.org/~rfrancoise/_______________________________________________ tcpdump-workers mailing list tcpdump-workers () lists tcpdump org https://lists.sandelman.ca/mailman/listinfo/tcpdump-workers
_______________________________________________ tcpdump-workers mailing list tcpdump-workers () lists tcpdump org https://lists.sandelman.ca/mailman/listinfo/tcpdump-workers
Current thread:
- Re: Official patches for CVE-2014-8767/CVE-2014-8768/CVE-2014-8769?, (continued)
- Re: Official patches for CVE-2014-8767/CVE-2014-8768/CVE-2014-8769? Romain Francoise (Nov 21)
- Re: Official patches for CVE-2014-8767/CVE-2014-8768/CVE-2014-8769? Romain Francoise (Nov 21)
- Re: Official patches for CVE-2014-8767/CVE-2014-8768/CVE-2014-8769? Michael Richardson (Nov 22)
- Re: Official patches for CVE-2014-8767/CVE-2014-8768/CVE-2014-8769? Michal Sekletar (Nov 23)
- Re: Official patches for CVE-2014-8767/CVE-2014-8768/CVE-2014-8769? Guy Harris (Nov 23)
- Re: Official patches for CVE-2014-8767/CVE-2014-8768/CVE-2014-8769? Romain Francoise (Nov 24)
- Re: Official patches for CVE-2014-8767/CVE-2014-8768/CVE-2014-8769? Guy Harris (Nov 24)
- Message not available
- Re: Official patches for CVE-2014-8767/CVE-2014-8768/CVE-2014-8769? Romain Francoise (Nov 25)
- Re: Official patches for CVE-2014-8767/CVE-2014-8768/CVE-2014-8769? Michal Sekletar (Nov 25)
- Re: Official patches for CVE-2014-8767/CVE-2014-8768/CVE-2014-8769? Kishore Kumar (Nov 25)
- Re: Official patches for CVE-2014-8767/CVE-2014-8768/CVE-2014-8769? Michal Sekletar (Nov 25)
- Re: Official patches for CVE-2014-8767/CVE-2014-8768/CVE-2014-8769? Romain Francoise (Nov 27)
- Re: Official patches for CVE-2014-8767/CVE-2014-8768/CVE-2014-8769? Michael Richardson (Nov 24)
- Re: Official patches for CVE-2014-8767/CVE-2014-8768/CVE-2014-8769? Michal Sekletar (Nov 24)
- Re: Official patches for CVE-2014-8767/CVE-2014-8768/CVE-2014-8769? Michael Richardson (Nov 24)
- Re: Official patches for CVE-2014-8767/CVE-2014-8768/CVE-2014-8769? Guy Harris (Nov 24)
- Re: Official patches for CVE-2014-8767/CVE-2014-8768/CVE-2014-8769? Denis Ovsienko (Nov 24)
- Re: Official patches for CVE-2014-8767/CVE-2014-8768/CVE-2014-8769? Guy Harris (Nov 24)
- Message not available
- bpf.tcpdump.org vs github Michael Richardson (Nov 24)
- Re: bpf.tcpdump.org vs github Guy Harris (Nov 24)
- Re: bpf.tcpdump.org vs github Denis Ovsienko (Nov 25)