Re: CVE-2012-5076 and CVE-2012-1723 Rules

["lists () packetmail net" <lists () packetmail net>]

On 11/26/2012 09:14 AM, Joel Esler wrote:
> As far as the community ruleset, the tl;dr is yes.

Excellent, thanks Joel, and thanks too for taking my E-Mail in the context it
was intended -- Friendly open discussion around differences in both rule sets.

I am very much looking forward to this getting completed and working with you
again.  Cooperation in the info sec community ensures the greater good will
benefit.  Having a well structured and working feedback loop from community
input (rules, URL structures, PCAPs, etc) will certainly strengthen the ruleset
in the same way it has on the ET side.

Best wishes,
Nathan

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Monitor your physical, virtual and cloud infrastructure from a single
web console. Get in-depth insight into apps, servers, databases, vmware,
SAP, cloud infrastructure, etc. Download 30-day Free Trial.
Pricing starts from $795 for 25 servers or applications!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/zoho_dev2dev_nov
_______________________________________________
Snort-sigs mailing list
Snort-sigs () lists sourceforge net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-sigs
http://www.snort.org


Please visit http://blog.snort.org for the latest news about Snort!