Snort mailing list archives

Re: [Emerging-Sigs] GPL rules - who maintains them?Nobody?


From: Nigel Houghton <nhoughton () sourcefire com>
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 20:13:23 -0400

On Mon, 21 Mar 2011 19:05:35 -0400, waldo kitty wrote:
On 3/21/2011 14:00, Nigel Houghton wrote:
I see. In that case, ET should act as an end-user, copy the rule to
another file, give it a new SID and leave the original alone and
disabled in the rule file. If the change is appropriate, send the
suggested modification along to us and we will handle it.

and herein is the crux of the apparent problem... why "you" 
(inclusive and apparently meaning VRT)... why not ET? especially 
since they are, at least, willing to provide the rules in a format 
that older snorts can handle and properly detect the traffic in 
question??

who owned them to start with? who maintained them to start with? why 
are they now as they are?

The original distribution point is snort.org, the original distributors 
are the Snort team and after it's inception, Sourcefire (in fact, when 
Sourcefire started the rule sids hadn't yet gotten much past 1000, and 
most of those are now deleted). IIRC, when I started at Sourcefire in 
2002, we were somewhere around the 1300 mark. So, if it's original 
distributor you want, then it's Sourcefire, that's "why not ET". You 
also omitted further relevant information from my email that is:

"In the case of the modification being needed for a currently supported 
version of Snort, the rule will get the update for each version (see 
#2). In the case of older, non-supported versions, the rule can remain 
where it is and any modification distributed for that version of Snort 
as the maintainer sees fit. Since we do not maintain rules for outdated 
versions of Snort, there will be no SID conflict.

This is a pretty simple process that merely relies on feedback to 
incorporate suitable changes with minimal impact on the end-user."

And for your convenience, here is the #2 in question again:

"2. False positive/negative content match change or addition of content 
match to improve detection. In this instance the rule gets modified for 
all currently supported versions of Snort and the rev for each rule is 
bumped. For folks who are running non-supported versions, this 
modification should be done by whoever wants to maintain the rules for 
those older sets and the rev bumped accordingly. Since rules for 
specific versions of Snort should be shipped in separate packages, this 
should not impose a problem."

--
Nigel Houghton
Head Mentalist
SF VRT Department of Intelligence Excellence
http://vrt-blog.snort.org/ && http://labs.snort.org/

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Enable your software for Intel(R) Active Management Technology to meet the
growing manageability and security demands of your customers. Businesses
are taking advantage of Intel(R) vPro (TM) technology - will your software 
be a part of the solution? Download the Intel(R) Manageability Checker 
today! http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devmar
_______________________________________________
Snort-users mailing list
Snort-users () lists sourceforge net
Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users
Snort-users list archive:
http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users


Current thread: