Snort mailing list archives

RE: Sourcefire Tactics - New Licensing


From: "Michael Steele" <michaels () winsnort com>
Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2005 23:53:29 -0800

Peter,
Ok, remember this when Sourcefire forks the source code for Snort. I doubt
that will ever happen, but who is to say what might happen down the road.

Sourcefire is where they are at this point because of the development that
was produced pre-Sourcefire. There was a LOT of development on Snort outside
of Marty, and Sourcefire has built on that development. It would have taken
years longer for Snort to be developed to where it was when Sourcefire was
created.

Sourcefire has placed a LOT of money into developing Snort, and that's a
given, but they are the biggest reapers of profit from Snort. I just heard
there is a 90k IDS solution that Sourcefire is or will be selling.

This is NO big deal. It's just one small step. If people don't really care
and voice their opinions it will leave the door open for further
restrictions. Remember, baby steps first.

Kindest regards, 
Michael...

WINSNORT.com Management Team Member
-- 
Pick up your FREE Windows or UNIX Snort installation guides       
mailto:support () winsnort com
Website: http://www.winsnort.com
Snort: Open Source Network IDS - http://www.snort.org



-----Original Message-----
From: snort-users-admin () lists sourceforge net [mailto:snort-users-
admin () lists sourceforge net] On Behalf Of James Riden
Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2005 11:44 AM
To: 'Snort Users Postings'
Subject: Re: [Snort-users] Sourcefire Tactics - New Licensing

"Peter J Manis" <pmanis () comcast net> writes:

I agree.  This is sad.  Essentially, what is happening here is
taking the open out of the opensource.  First the rules from
Sourcefire, and now they are trying to take Bleeding Snort.  I
understand if Sourcefire is upset about a few individuals using
their rules, but what business do they have attempting to take
Bleeding Snort under their control?  This is clearly a coorporation
hoax to monopolize the development of Snort rules, first by
licensing the Sourcefire rules, and now trying to get Bleeding Snort
to abide by their licenses!  Next will be Snort itself!

I suggest you ask for your money back.

This is not the end of the world; it's precisely what the GPL was
designed for. Anyone who wants to fork the current sourcecode and
rulebase may do so, and do their own development.

--
James Riden / j.riden () massey ac nz / Systems Security Engineer
Information Technology Services, Massey University, NZ.
GPG public key available at: http://www.massey.ac.nz/~jriden/




-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
_______________________________________________
Snort-users mailing list
Snort-users () lists sourceforge net
Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users
Snort-users list archive:
http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users







-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
_______________________________________________
Snort-users mailing list
Snort-users () lists sourceforge net
Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users
Snort-users list archive:
http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users


Current thread: