Re: Re: Java sandboxing not used much

["Kenneth R. van Wyk" <Ken () KRvW com>]

Jared W. Robinson wrote:


Complex security systems are often completely ignored.


I agree, but I wouldn't stop there...


The simplicity of the traditional UNIX permission model means that it is
more likely to be used than abused.


Well, I've seen at least one pretty spectacular exception to this.  An 
app that I reviewed some time back had been ported (apparently from 
MS-DOS) to a UNIX environment.  In their rush to get the port to 
function, the developers left the permissions at 777 (read/write/execute 
to all).  To make matters worse, the app executables and data were in 
the same directory, which was also mode 777.  Just goes to show you that 
people will find the path of least resistance even if you make things easy.


As an aside, I'm curious how common it is to find mistakes like that 
made when porting an application from one OS to another.  My bet is that 
the people doing the porting probably didn't design or write the 
original app, and that they had never worked on a UNIX system before.  
Setting everything 777 is sloppy, but probably cut down the number of 
"access denied" errors that they couldn't figure out... ;-\


Cheers,

Ken van Wyk
http://www.krvw.com