Secure Coding mailing list archives
RE: Hypothetical design question
From: "Robert Shields" <rshields () star net uk>
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2004 15:16:03 +0000
In other words, could an email client be designed and implemented that would satisfy both the users and the security requirements? Or, is the problem too difficult without sacrificing some functionality?
No doubt this could be done, but should it? Wouldn't it make more sense to scan for viruses at the mail gateway, and keep the mail client dumb? This is what companies like messagelabs and postini are offering, with some success it should be noted. Rob Shields Software Engineer Star Internet Ltd This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk _____________________________________________________________________
Current thread:
- RE: Hypothetical design question, (continued)
- RE: Hypothetical design question Michael S Hines (Jan 28)
- Re: Hypothetical design question Kenneth R. van Wyk (Jan 29)
- Re: Hypothetical design question Paco Hope (Jan 28)
- Re: Hypothetical design question Dave Aronson (Jan 28)
- Re: Hypothetical design question Andreas Saurwein (Jan 28)
- RE: Hypothetical design question Alun Jones (Jan 28)
- RE: Hypothetical design question Michael S Hines (Feb 02)
- Re: Hypothetical design question Louis Solomon [SteelBytes] (Feb 03)
- RE: Hypothetical design question Jason Wilcox (Feb 03)
- RE: Hypothetical design question ljknews (Jan 28)
- RE: Hypothetical design question Dave Paris (Jan 29)
- RE: Hypothetical design question ljknews (Jan 29)
- Re: Hypothetical design question Paco Hope (Jan 29)
- Re: Hypothetical design question David Harmon (Jan 30)
- RE: Hypothetical design question David Crocker (Jan 30)
- RE: Hypothetical design question Alun Jones (Feb 01)