PaulDotCom mailing list archives
Re: Little Snitch
From: Guillaume Ross <guillaume () binaryfactory ca>
Date: Tue, 21 May 2013 09:59:33 -0400
I have not tested Hands Off but I do remember seeing that one of the advantages it had over Little Snitch was inbound monitoring and management - which Little Snitch added in version 3. They both look relatively user friendly and seem to work in very similar ways. It would be very interesting to see an in depth comparison indeed, especially now that LS has inbound functionality too.. Guillaume On 2013-05-19, at 2:23 PM, Matthew Schwartz <matthew.r.schwartz () gmail com> wrote:
Has anyone evaluated Hands Off by metakine.com, I've been using Little Snitch? Matthew On May 16, 2013, at 10:36 AM, Mike Perez <mike () pauldotcom com> wrote:I believe that if you look at the "default" rules, UDP is set to be allowed. Check your default ruleset. Mike Sent from my Windows Phone From: Carlos Perez Sent: 5/16/2013 10:17 To: PaulDotCom Security Weekly Mailing List Subject: Re: [Pauldotcom] Little Snitch Tuns out the payload was using the local resolver and does bypassing little snitch On May 15, 2013, at 4:55 PM, Carlos Perez <carlos_perez () darkoperator com> wrote:One interesting thing UDP traffic does not get flagged only TCP just noticed it testing some python scripts On May 13, 2013, at 10:13 AM, Anastasios Monachos <anastasiosm () gmail com> wrote:Personally +1 for LS, other alternative "Hands off" On 13 May 2013 05:42, Mike Perez <mike () pauldotcom com> wrote: Thanks everyone for the replies. I am using the latest version, and becoming more paranoid by the minute! ;) On Sun, May 12, 2013 at 4:51 AM, Xavier Mertens <xavier () rootshell be> wrote: Hi Mike, I'm using the latest release on my 10.8.3, for me it's a "must have"! Since version 3, they greatly improved the "network monitor" and rules editor. /x -- "If the enemy leaves a door open, you must rush in." - Sun Tzu PGP Key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x42D006FD51AD7F2C On 11 May 2013, at 18:50, Mike Perez <mike () pauldotcom com> wrote:Hi Folks, I tested Little Snitch a while back when it was not Lion compatible. I'm curious what other folks are recommending nowadays. Are folks still happy with Little Snitch or are there other recommendations? Thanks, Mike -- Mike Perez Executive Producer, PaulDotCom Security Weekly PaulDotCom Enterprises Web: http://pauldotcom.com _______________________________________________ Pauldotcom mailing list Pauldotcom () mail pauldotcom com http://mail.pauldotcom.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pauldotcom Main Web Site: http://pauldotcom.com_______________________________________________ Pauldotcom mailing list Pauldotcom () mail pauldotcom com http://mail.pauldotcom.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pauldotcom Main Web Site: http://pauldotcom.com -- Mike Perez Executive Producer, PaulDotCom Security Weekly PaulDotCom Enterprises Web: http://pauldotcom.com _______________________________________________ Pauldotcom mailing list Pauldotcom () mail pauldotcom com http://mail.pauldotcom.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pauldotcom Main Web Site: http://pauldotcom.com -- AM (secuid0) Key ID: 0x5EB17EE7 _______________________________________________ Pauldotcom mailing list Pauldotcom () mail pauldotcom com http://mail.pauldotcom.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pauldotcom Main Web Site: http://pauldotcom.com_______________________________________________ Pauldotcom mailing list Pauldotcom () mail pauldotcom com http://mail.pauldotcom.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pauldotcom Main Web Site: http://pauldotcom.com_______________________________________________ Pauldotcom mailing list Pauldotcom () mail pauldotcom com http://mail.pauldotcom.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pauldotcom Main Web Site: http://pauldotcom.com
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ Pauldotcom mailing list Pauldotcom () mail pauldotcom com http://mail.pauldotcom.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pauldotcom Main Web Site: http://pauldotcom.com
Current thread:
- Re: Little Snitch, (continued)
- Re: Little Snitch Matt (May 12)
- Re: Little Snitch Ultultult (May 12)
- Re: Little Snitch Sumeet Narula (May 12)
- Re: Little Snitch Xavier Mertens (May 12)
- Re: Little Snitch Mike Perez (May 12)
- Re: Little Snitch Anastasios Monachos (May 13)
- Re: Little Snitch Carlos Perez (May 16)
- Re: Little Snitch Carlos Perez (May 16)
- Re: Little Snitch Mike Perez (May 12)
- Re: Little Snitch Matthew Schwartz (May 20)
- Re: Little Snitch Guillaume Ross (May 21)