Nmap Development mailing list archives

Re: Version display: included vs. system libraries


From: Kris Katterjohn <katterjohn () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2011 23:13:45 -0600

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 02/09/2011 10:28 PM, ambarisha b wrote:
I like "nmap-" prefix because changing the library name indicates that
the library might have been edited for nmap as in libdnet.The other
two seem to indicate that we have just included the actual libraries
with nmap.


If that's a concern, instead of "* = Nmap included" (kept quoted below) we
could just have "* = Nmap packaged" or something along those lines.

Cheers
Ambarisha


Cheers,
Kris Katterjohn

On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 5:40 AM, Kris Katterjohn <katterjohn () gmail com> wrote:
On 02/09/2011 05:56 PM, David Fifield wrote:
1. Use a mark like an asterisk to show included libraries.

Compiled with: libpcre-7.6 *libpcap-0.9.8 *libdnet-1.12 ipv6
Compiled without: liblua openssl
* = Nmap included


I like this one best of your 3 ideas.  It's short and understandable.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
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=OZh+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list
http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev
Archived at http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/


Current thread: