Nmap Development mailing list archives
Re: Possible new device categories for service detection
From: Fyodor <fyodor () insecure org>
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 00:08:16 -0800
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 02:20:59AM +0000, doug () hcsw org wrote:
Hi Fyodor, On Sun, Feb 08, 2009 at 02:52:24PM -0800 or thereabouts, Fyodor wrote:On Sun, Feb 08, 2009 at 10:41:19PM +0000, doug () hcsw org wrote:Like Fyodor suggested I will write up a short description of each of the categories and then we can revise them and make an official list.Great! I think this discussion demonstrates the need.I re-read your earlier message and noticed these modifications: o Put 'projector' into 'media device' o Change 'broadband modem' to 'broadband router' Do you want me to revise my device type list and add it to the docs somewhere?
Hm, I didn't realize that nmap-service-probes had projectors too. Maybe it is worth having its own category. Or perhaps what would be best is splitting up 'media device' into something like 'media display' (so we could combine TVs, projectors, etc.) and then maybe leave 'media device' or have a new name for things like DVRs and other media boxes wich control displays. I'm not sure if this is worth doing or not. You're right that there are projectors in 'specialized'. We should, at the very minimize, canonicalize it so they are all in the same category, whichever one that is. Maybe the best place for now is just to check the list into nmap/docs/(whatevername). Then it can be a sort of poor hacker's wiki and we can all edit it as desire. Then when that editing is done, we can put it into os-detection.xml.
Hm. You said you think it should go in the OS detection chapter but I guess it's equally applicable to service detection. Maybe some section common to both chapters?
I like the idea of putting it into os-detection.xml, but referencing it from the version detection chapter too. The d// stuff in nmap-service-probes is sort of a "hack" to allow version detection to encroach on OS detection's turf. But to do so in a way that adds extra value that you don't get with plain TCP/IP fingerprinting OS detection. Cheers, -F _______________________________________________ Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev Archived at http://SecLists.Org
Current thread:
- Possible new device categories for service detection doug (Feb 08)
- Re: Possible new device categories for service detection Fyodor (Feb 08)
- Re: Possible new device categories for service detection David Fifield (Feb 08)
- Re: Possible new device categories for service detection doug (Feb 08)
- Re: Possible new device categories for service detection Brandon Enright (Feb 08)
- Re: Possible new device categories for service detection Fyodor (Feb 08)
- Re: Possible new device categories for service detection doug (Feb 10)
- Re: Possible new device categories for service detection doug (Feb 10)
- Re: Possible new device categories for service detection Fyodor (Feb 11)
- Re: Possible new device categories for service detection doug (Feb 11)
- Re: Possible new device categories for service detection David Fifield (Feb 08)
- Re: Possible new device categories for service detection Fyodor (Feb 08)
- Re: Possible new device categories for service detection David Fifield (Feb 08)
- Re: Possible new device categories for service detection Fyodor (Feb 08)
- Re: Possible new device categories for service detection doug (Feb 08)
- Re: Possible new device categories for service detection David Fifield (Feb 20)
- Re: Possible new device categories for service detection David Fifield (Feb 20)
- Re: Possible new device categories for service detection doug (Feb 20)
- Re: Possible new device categories for service detection Fyodor (Feb 20)
- Re: Possible new device categories for service detection David Fifield (Feb 25)