Nmap Development mailing list archives
Re: Re[2]: nmap+V
From: Fyodor <fyodor () insecure org>
Date: Sat, 6 Sep 2003 19:55:59 -0700
On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 01:30:12AM +0100, testic wrote:
Service detection certainly belongs within Nmap itself, for the very reasons Fyodor pointed out. If service detection were to be implemented into Nmap what level of detail would we be talking about? Would it for instance say "Port 1234 is running a HTTP server" or would it say "Port 1234 is running a HTTP server (Apache1.2.3)" ?
I suppose it would say something like: # nmap -A -T4 -F www.insecure.org Starting nmap 3.40PVT16 ( http://www.insecure.org/nmap/ ) at 2003-09-06 19:49 PDT Interesting ports on www.insecure.org (205.217.153.53): (The 1206 ports scanned but not shown below are in state: filtered) PORT STATE SERVICE VERSION 22/tcp open ssh OpenSSH 3.1p1 (protocol 1.99) 25/tcp open smtp Qmail smtpd 53/tcp open domain ISC Bind 9.2.1 80/tcp open http Apache httpd 2.0.39 ((Unix) mod_perl/1.99_07-dev Perl/v5.6.1) 113/tcp closed auth Device type: general purpose Running: Linux 2.4.X|2.5.X OS details: Linux Kernel 2.4.0 - 2.5.20 Uptime 108.307 days (since Wed May 21 12:27:44 2003) Nmap run completed -- 1 IP address (1 host up) scanned in 34.962 seconds Cheers, -F --------------------------------------------------------------------- For help using this (nmap-dev) mailing list, send a blank email to nmap-dev-help () insecure org . List run by ezmlm-idx (www.ezmlm.org).
Current thread:
- Re[2]: nmap+V, (continued)
- Re[2]: nmap+V Bo Cato (Sep 02)
- Re: nmap+V Jay Freeman (saurik) (Sep 01)
- Re: nmap+V Fyodor (Sep 01)
- Re: nmap+V testic (Aug 31)
- Re: nmap+V testic (Aug 31)
- Re: nmap+V Jay Freeman (saurik) (Aug 31)
- Re: Re[2]: nmap+V Max (Sep 02)
- Re: Re[2]: nmap+V Fyodor (Sep 02)
- Re: Re[2]: nmap+V Max (Sep 02)
- Re: Re[2]: nmap+V testic (Sep 02)
- Re: Re[2]: nmap+V Fyodor (Sep 06)