Nmap Development mailing list archives
Re: Re[2]: nmap+V
From: "testic" <testic () btinternet com>
Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2003 01:30:12 +0100
Service detection certainly belongs within Nmap itself, for the very reasons Fyodor pointed out. If service detection were to be implemented into Nmap what level of detail would we be talking about? Would it for instance say "Port 1234 is running a HTTP server" or would it say "Port 1234 is running a HTTP server (Apache1.2.3)" ? I think simply being able to tell which protocol is running on a certain port is sufficient, certainly for my own purposes. Although being able to determine software versions are running would be very nice indeed. But I imagine being able to tell between various FTP servers would be tricky and require some quite complex jiggery-pokery. As regards Max's point about having seperated 'modules' I think it would be good to be able to download the latest OS fingerprints file, for example, without having to download the entire package. testic --------------------------------------------------------------------- For help using this (nmap-dev) mailing list, send a blank email to nmap-dev-help () insecure org . List run by ezmlm-idx (www.ezmlm.org).
Current thread:
- Re: nmap+V, (continued)
- Re: nmap+V Jamie (Sep 02)
- Re[2]: nmap+V Bo Cato (Sep 02)
- Re: nmap+V Jay Freeman (saurik) (Sep 01)
- Re: nmap+V Fyodor (Sep 01)
- Re: nmap+V testic (Aug 31)
- Re: nmap+V testic (Aug 31)
- Re: nmap+V Jay Freeman (saurik) (Aug 31)
- Re: Re[2]: nmap+V Max (Sep 02)
- Re: Re[2]: nmap+V Fyodor (Sep 02)
- Re: Re[2]: nmap+V Max (Sep 02)
- Re: Re[2]: nmap+V testic (Sep 02)
- Re: Re[2]: nmap+V Fyodor (Sep 06)