nanog mailing list archives

Re: Networks ignoring prepends?


From: Chris Adams <cma () cmadams net>
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2024 14:29:35 -0600

Once upon a time, William Herrin <bill () herrin us> said:
Because big operators think it reasonable to localpref distance routes
ahead of nearby ones so long as the distant routes arrive from
customers. I'll remember that the next time folks complain about the
size of the routing table. This one you did to yourselves.

This isn't some "big operators" conspiracy... it's how lots of networks
with BGP customers work (even small networks).  BGP has no knowledge of
the distance you keep emphasizing, and path prepends have always been
known to be down the decision tree.

When you receive a route over a paid link, it's not unreasonable to
assume it's because your paying customer wants that traffic from you.
It's been pretty standard practice to localpref up routes from your
customers for a long time, and then (often but not always) provide
communities for said customers to override the localpref.  Being a
customer of a customer makes that harder, but then it's basically on you
to choose your connections with that in mind.
-- 
Chris Adams <cma () cmadams net>


Current thread: