nanog mailing list archives
Re: Networks ignoring prepends?
From: Chris Adams <cma () cmadams net>
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2024 18:00:27 -0600
Once upon a time, William Herrin <bill () herrin us> said:
Nevertheless, in the protocol's design, the one expressed in the RFC's, AS path length = distance.
The RFC doesn't make any equivalence between AS path length and distance. You are the one trying to make that equivalence, but that's not how BGP is used on the Internet. You're about 30 years too late to have any influence on that. -- Chris Adams <cma () cmadams net>
Current thread:
- Re: Networks ignoring prepends?, (continued)
- Re: Networks ignoring prepends? Alex Le Heux (Jan 23)
- Re: Networks ignoring prepends? Tom Beecher (Jan 23)
- Re: Networks ignoring prepends? Jay Borkenhagen (Jan 23)
- Re: Networks ignoring prepends? Owen DeLong via NANOG (Jan 23)
- Re: Networks ignoring prepends? William Herrin (Jan 23)
- Re: Networks ignoring prepends? Chris Adams (Jan 23)
- Re: Networks ignoring prepends? Niels Bakker (Jan 23)
- Re: Networks ignoring prepends? William Herrin (Jan 23)
- Re: Networks ignoring prepends? Tom Beecher (Jan 23)
- Re: Networks ignoring prepends? William Herrin (Jan 23)
- Re: Networks ignoring prepends? Chris Adams (Jan 23)
- Re: Networks ignoring prepends? William Herrin (Jan 23)
- Re: Networks ignoring prepends? Robert Raszuk (Jan 24)
- Re: Networks ignoring prepends? James Jun (Jan 24)
- Re: Networks ignoring prepends? Chris Adams (Jan 24)
- Re: Networks ignoring prepends? William Herrin (Jan 24)
- Re: Networks ignoring prepends? Chris Adams (Jan 24)
- Re: Networks ignoring prepends? Majdi S. Abbas (Jan 23)
- Re: Networks ignoring prepends? Owen DeLong via NANOG (Jan 24)
- Re: Networks ignoring prepends? William Herrin (Jan 24)
- Re: Networks ignoring prepends? Owen DeLong via NANOG (Jan 24)