nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 Traffic Re: IPv6? Re: Where to Use 240/4 Re: 202401100645.AYC Re: IPv4 address block
From: Christopher Hawker <chris () thesysadmin au>
Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2024 21:05:21 +1100
I strongly disagree that IPv6 is very much an afterthought. A perfect example is that in Australia, our largest mobile network provider Telstra, has completely moved to IPv6 single-stack on their mobile network for pre-paid and post-paid customers. Russell Langton made the announcement in February 2020 that Telstra was making the transition and they have since completed this transition. T-Mobile US also went single-stack back in 2014. India, with a population of 1.43 billion people (accounting for 17% of the world's population, sits at 81.24% capable, 80.71% preferred. With a global rate of 36.49% IPv6 capable and 35.61% IPv6 preferred, we still have a long way to go however our current achievements to-date should be commended. Regards, Christopher Hawker Links: https://lists.ausnog.net/pipermail/ausnog/2020-February/043869.html https://www.internetsociety.org/deploy360/2014/case-study-t-mobile-us-goes-ipv6-only-using-464xlat/ https://stats.labs.apnic.net/ipv6 On Mon, 15 Jan 2024 at 20:09, Saku Ytti <saku () ytti fi> wrote:
On Mon, 15 Jan 2024 at 10:59, jordi.palet--- via NANOG <nanog () nanog org> wrote:No, I’m not saying that. I’m saying "in actual deployments", whichdoesn’t mean that everyone is deploying, we are missing many ISPs, we are missing many enterprises. Because of low entropy of A-B pairs in bps volume, seeing massive amounts of IPv6 in IPv6 enabled networks is not indicative of IPv6 success. I don't disagree with your assertion, I just think it's damaging, because readers without context will form an idea that things are going smoothly. We should rightly be in panic mode and forget all the IPv4 extension crap and start thinking how do we ensure IPv6 happens and how do we ensure we get back to single stack Internet. IPv6 is very much an afterthought, a 2nd class citizen today. You can deploy new features and software without IPv6, and it's fine. IPv6 can be broken, and it's not an all-hands-on-deck problem, no one is calling. -- ++ytti
Current thread:
- Re: Where to Use 240/4 Re: 202401100645.AYC Re: IPv4 address block, (continued)
- Re: Where to Use 240/4 Re: 202401100645.AYC Re: IPv4 address block Ryan Hamel (Jan 11)
- IPv6? Re: Where to Use 240/4 Re: 202401100645.AYC Re: IPv4 address block Abraham Y. Chen (Jan 12)
- Re: IPv6? Re: Where to Use 240/4 Re: 202401100645.AYC Re: IPv4 address block Ryan Hamel (Jan 12)
- IPv6 Traffic Re: IPv6? Re: Where to Use 240/4 Re: 202401100645.AYC Re: IPv4 address block Abraham Y. Chen (Jan 14)
- Re: IPv6 Traffic Re: IPv6? Re: Where to Use 240/4 Re: 202401100645.AYC Re: IPv4 address block Forrest Christian (List Account) (Jan 14)
- Re: IPv6 Traffic Re: IPv6? Re: Where to Use 240/4 Re: 202401100645.AYC Re: IPv4 address block Saku Ytti (Jan 14)
- Re: IPv6 Traffic Re: IPv6? Re: Where to Use 240/4 Re: 202401100645.AYC Re: IPv4 address block jordi.palet--- via NANOG (Jan 15)
- Re: IPv6 Traffic Re: IPv6? Re: Where to Use 240/4 Re: 202401100645.AYC Re: IPv4 address block Saku Ytti (Jan 15)
- Re: IPv6 Traffic Re: IPv6? Re: Where to Use 240/4 Re: 202401100645.AYC Re: IPv4 address block jordi.palet--- via NANOG (Jan 15)
- Re: IPv6 Traffic Re: IPv6? Re: Where to Use 240/4 Re: 202401100645.AYC Re: IPv4 address block Saku Ytti (Jan 15)
- Re: IPv6 Traffic Re: IPv6? Re: Where to Use 240/4 Re: 202401100645.AYC Re: IPv4 address block Christopher Hawker (Jan 15)
- Re: IPv6 Traffic Re: IPv6? Re: Where to Use 240/4 Re: 202401100645.AYC Re: IPv4 address block Michael Thomas (Jan 15)
- Re: IPv6 Traffic Re: IPv6? Re: Where to Use 240/4 Re: 202401100645.AYC Re: IPv4 address block Michael Thomas (Jan 15)
- Re: IPv6 Traffic Re: IPv6? Re: Where to Use 240/4 Re: 202401100645.AYC Re: IPv4 address block Saku Ytti (Jan 15)
- Re: IPv6 Traffic Re: IPv6? Re: Where to Use 240/4 Re: 202401100645.AYC Re: IPv4 address block Michael Thomas (Jan 16)
- Re: IPv6 Traffic Re: IPv6? Re: Where to Use 240/4 Re: 202401100645.AYC Re: IPv4 address block Owen DeLong via NANOG (Jan 16)
- Re: IPv6? Re: Where to Use 240/4 Re: 202401100645.AYC Re: IPv4 address block Owen DeLong via NANOG (Jan 12)
- Re: IPv6? Re: Where to Use 240/4 Re: 202401100645.AYC Re: IPv4 address block borg (Jan 12)
- Re: IPv6? Re: Where to Use 240/4 Re: 202401100645.AYC Re: IPv4 address block Michael Thomas (Jan 12)
- Re: IPv6? Re: Where to Use 240/4 Re: 202401100645.AYC Re: IPv4 address block Seth David Schoen (Jan 12)
- Re: IPv6? Re: Where to Use 240/4 Re: 202401100645.AYC Re: IPv4 address block Darrel Lewis (Jan 12)