Re: IPv6 Traffic Re: IPv6? Re: Where to Use 240/4 Re: 202401100645.AYC Re: IPv4 address block

["jordi.palet--- via NANOG" <nanog () nanog org>]

No, I’m not saying that. I’m saying "in actual deployments", which doesn’t mean that everyone is deploying, we are 
missing many ISPs, we are missing many enterprises.

Saludos,
Jordi

@jordipalet


> El 15 ene 2024, a las 9:26, Saku Ytti <saku () ytti fi> escribió:
>
> On Mon, 15 Jan 2024 at 10:05, jordi.palet--- via NANOG <nanog () nanog org> wrote:
>
> > In actual customer deployments I see the same levels, even up to 85% of IPv6 traffic. It basically depends on the 
> > usage of the caches and the % of residential vs corporate customers.
>
> You think you are contributing to the IPv6 cause, by explaining how
> positive the situation is. But in reality you are damaging it greatly,
> because you're not communicating that we are not on a path to IPv4
> free Internet. If we had been on such a path, we would have been IPv4
> free for more than a decade. And unless we admit we are not on that
> path, we will not work to get on that path.
>
> -- 
>  ++ytti



**********************************************
IPv4 is over
Are you ready for the new Internet ?
http://www.theipv6company.com
The IPv6 Company

This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be 
for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, 
distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly 
prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any 
disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached 
files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original sender to 
inform about this communication and delete it.