nanog mailing list archives
Re: Routed optical networks
From: Mark Tinka <mark@tinka.africa>
Date: Wed, 3 May 2023 06:18:57 +0200
On 5/2/23 16:25, Izaac wrote:
This is a very convoluted way of backing into the ole packet-switched vs. circuit switched decision.
A fight that will never go away.There has been some compromise in recent years, with Transport-heavy customers accepting standard Ethernet services, but only if they are carried by a Transport device.
Mark.
Current thread:
- Re: Routed optical networks, (continued)
- Re: Routed optical networks Etienne-Victor Depasquale via NANOG (May 02)
- Re: Routed optical networks Matt Erculiani (May 01)
- Re: Routed optical networks Izaac (May 02)
- Re: Routed optical networks Etienne-Victor Depasquale via NANOG (May 02)
- Re: Routed optical networks Jared Mauch (May 02)
- Re: Routed optical networks Eve Griliches (May 02)
- Re: Routed optical networks Mark Tinka (May 02)
- Re: Routed optical networks Etienne-Victor Depasquale via NANOG (May 02)
- Re: Routed optical networks Jared Mauch (May 05)
- Re: Routed optical networks Izaac (May 02)
- Re: Routed optical networks Mark Tinka (May 02)
- Re: Routed optical networks Mark Tinka (May 02)
- Re: Routed optical networks Mark Tinka (May 02)
- RE: Routed optical networks Vasilenko Eduard via NANOG (May 02)
- Re: Routed optical networks Mark Tinka (May 03)
- Message not available
- RE: Routed optical networks Vasilenko Eduard via NANOG (May 03)
- Re: Routed optical networks Mark Tinka (May 03)
- Re: Routed optical networks Mike Hammett (May 05)
- RE: Routed optical networks Vasilenko Eduard via NANOG (May 05)
- Re: Routed optical networks Mark Tinka (May 05)