nanog mailing list archives

Re: Routed optical networks


From: Etienne-Victor Depasquale via NANOG <nanog () nanog org>
Date: Tue, 2 May 2023 20:29:11 +0200


On Mon, May 01, 2023 at 02:56:47PM -0600, Matt Erculiani wrote:
In short, the idea is that optical networks are wasteful and routers do a
better job making more use of a network's capacity than ROADMs. Take the
extra router hop (or 3 or 8) versus short-cutting it with an optical
network because the silicon is so low-latency anyway that it hardly
makes a
difference now. Putting more GBs per second on fewer strands means
saving a
lot of money on infrastructure costs.

This is a very convoluted way of backing into the ole packet-switched
vs. circuit switched decision.


I don't follow.
While ROADMs can be thought of as circuit-switchers,
the number of concurrent clients and switching latency put ROADMs on a
different operational level than packet switchers, right?

Cheers,

Etienne

On Tue, May 2, 2023 at 4:29 PM Izaac <izaac () setec org> wrote:

On Mon, May 01, 2023 at 02:56:47PM -0600, Matt Erculiani wrote:
In short, the idea is that optical networks are wasteful and routers do a
better job making more use of a network's capacity than ROADMs. Take the
extra router hop (or 3 or 8) versus short-cutting it with an optical
network because the silicon is so low-latency anyway that it hardly
makes a
difference now. Putting more GBs per second on fewer strands means
saving a
lot of money on infrastructure costs.

This is a very convoluted way of backing into the ole packet-switched
vs. circuit switched decision.

--
. ___ ___  .   .  ___
.  \    /  |\  |\ \
.  _\_ /__ |-\ |-\ \__



-- 
Ing. Etienne-Victor Depasquale
Assistant Lecturer
Department of Communications & Computer Engineering
Faculty of Information & Communication Technology
University of Malta
Web. https://www.um.edu.mt/profile/etiennedepasquale

Current thread: