Re: Upstream bandwidth usage

[Mike Hammett <nanog () ics-il net>]

It's not always something the service provider has the ability to change. 




----- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 

Midwest Internet Exchange 

The Brothers WISP 

----- Original Message -----

From: "Michael Thomas" <mike () mtcc com> 
To: "Mike Hammett" <nanog () ics-il net> 
Cc: nanog () nanog org 
Sent: Saturday, June 11, 2022 2:38:29 PM 
Subject: Re: Upstream bandwidth usage 




On 6/10/22 6:52 AM, Mike Hammett wrote: 



Due to the demand being predominately in the downward direction, half-duplex (or effectively half-duplex) systems 
either allocate more TDMA slots or more channels to downstream, at the expense of upstream. 



Well, my dsl provider has like a 25/5 50/10 so clearly everybody has the headroom to get to 10 at least. Marketing, of 
course, but I wonder how many support calls they got because "my internet is slow" from saturated upstream with zoom 
calls. I mean, most users have no clue about such things. 


Mike 



<blockquote>





----- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 

Midwest-IX 
http://www.midwest-ix.com 

----- Original Message -----

From: "Michael Thomas" <mike () mtcc com> 
To: nanog () nanog org 
Sent: Thursday, June 9, 2022 3:46:24 PM 
Subject: Re: Upstream bandwidth usage 


On 6/9/22 1:26 PM, Mel Beckman wrote: 
> With 430 GB versus 32 GV average down versus up usage today, according 
> to your article, this is still not a case for symmetrical consumer 
> bandwidth. Yes, the upstream usage increased slightly more than the 
> downstream usage. But the ratio was still so big that it would take 
> decades for them to join. I doubt they ever will. Consumers just don’t 
> have that much days up to push yet, and probably never will. 
>
> Also, a lot of that Usage can be explained by video conferencing 
> during Covid, which has dropped off significantly already. 
If it's so tiny, why shape it aggressively? Why shouldn't I be able to 
burst to whatever is available at the moment? I would think most users 
would be happy with that. 

Mike 



</blockquote>