nanog mailing list archives
Re: Upstream bandwidth usage
From: Mark Tinka <mark@tinka.africa>
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2022 06:11:19 +0200
On 6/9/22 22:46, Michael Thomas wrote:
If it's so tiny, why shape it aggressively? Why shouldn't I be able to burst to whatever is available at the moment? I would think most users would be happy with that.
The issue is generally the underlying last mile access. Even GPON is not symmetric, although it offers higher bandwidth than legacy solutions.
Mark.
Current thread:
- Upstream bandwidth usage Fletcher Kittredge (Jun 09)
- Re: Upstream bandwidth usage Mel Beckman (Jun 09)
- Re: Upstream bandwidth usage Michael Thomas (Jun 09)
- Re: Upstream bandwidth usage Niels Bakker (Jun 09)
- Re: Upstream bandwidth usage Mel Beckman (Jun 09)
- RE: Upstream bandwidth usage Adam Thompson (Jun 09)
- Re: Upstream bandwidth usage Mark Tinka (Jun 09)
- Re: Upstream bandwidth usage Masataka Ohta (Jun 10)
- Re: Upstream bandwidth usage Mike Hammett (Jun 10)
- Re: Upstream bandwidth usage Michael Thomas (Jun 11)
- Re: Upstream bandwidth usage Mike Hammett (Jun 11)
- Re: Upstream bandwidth usage Josh Luthman (Jun 12)
- Re: Upstream bandwidth usage Michael Thomas (Jun 09)
- Re: Upstream bandwidth usage Mel Beckman (Jun 09)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Upstream bandwidth usage Mel Beckman (Jun 09)
- Re: Upstream bandwidth usage Adam Thompson (Jun 09)
- Re: Upstream bandwidth usage Michael Thomas (Jun 09)