nanog mailing list archives

Re: Upstream bandwidth usage


From: Niels Bakker <niels=nanog () bakker net>
Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2022 23:08:42 +0200

* mike () mtcc com (Michael Thomas) [Thu 09 Jun 2022, 22:46 CEST]:
If it's so tiny, why shape it aggressively? Why shouldn't I be able to burst to whatever is available at the moment? I would think most users would be happy with that.

As SBC Global's peering policy roughly two decades ago stated,

"No requirement for a balanced traffic exchange ratio due primarily to the asymmetric nature of current broadband metallic transmission systems such as ADSL and cable modems."


        -- Niels.


Current thread: