nanog mailing list archives
Re: Upstream bandwidth usage
From: Michael Thomas <mike () mtcc com>
Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2022 16:35:05 -0700
On 6/9/22 4:31 PM, Mel Beckman wrote:
Adam, Your point on asymmetrical technologies is excellent. But you may not be aware that residential optical fiber is also asymmetrical. For example, GPON, the latest ITU specified PON standard, and the most widely deployed, calls for a 2.4 Gbps downstream and a 1.25 Gbps upstream optical line rate.
Why would they mandate such a thing? That seems like purely an operator decision.
Mike
Current thread:
- Re: Upstream bandwidth usage, (continued)
- Re: Upstream bandwidth usage Mark Tinka (Jun 09)
- Re: Upstream bandwidth usage Masataka Ohta (Jun 10)
- Re: Upstream bandwidth usage Mike Hammett (Jun 10)
- Re: Upstream bandwidth usage Michael Thomas (Jun 11)
- Re: Upstream bandwidth usage Mike Hammett (Jun 11)
- Re: Upstream bandwidth usage Josh Luthman (Jun 12)
- Re: Upstream bandwidth usage Adam Thompson (Jun 09)
- Re: Upstream bandwidth usage Michael Thomas (Jun 09)
- Re: Upstream bandwidth usage Raymond Burkholder (Jun 09)
- Re: Upstream bandwidth usage Mel Beckman (Jun 09)
- Re: Upstream bandwidth usage Brandon Jackson (Jun 09)
- RE: Upstream bandwidth usage Vasilenko Eduard via NANOG (Jun 10)
- Re: Upstream bandwidth usage Dave Bell (Jun 10)
- Re: Upstream bandwidth usage Mark Tinka (Jun 10)
- RE: Upstream bandwidth usage Vasilenko Eduard via NANOG (Jun 10)
- Re: Upstream bandwidth usage Mark Tinka (Jun 10)
- Re: Upstream bandwidth usage Jared Mauch (Jun 10)
- Re: Upstream bandwidth usage Kord Martin (Jun 10)