nanog mailing list archives
Re: Upstream bandwidth usage
From: Mark Tinka <mark@tinka.africa>
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2022 10:31:47 +0200
On 6/10/22 09:52, Vasilenko Eduard via NANOG wrote:
I did believe that it is about the cost of SFP on the CPE/ONT side: 5$ against 7$ makes a big difference if you multiply by 1000000. By the way, there are many deployments of 10G symmetric PON. It was promoted for "Enterprise clients". CPE cost hurts in this case. But some CPE could be 10GE and another 1GE upstream (10G downstream) on the same tree.
Yes, XG-PON.Most FTTH operator stories I've heard of are still running regular GPON, thought.
Seems XG-PON has a high barrier-to-entry for el-cheapo home consumers. Mark.
Current thread:
- Re: Upstream bandwidth usage, (continued)
- Re: Upstream bandwidth usage Mel Beckman (Jun 09)
- Re: Upstream bandwidth usage Adam Thompson (Jun 09)
- Re: Upstream bandwidth usage Michael Thomas (Jun 09)
- Re: Upstream bandwidth usage Raymond Burkholder (Jun 09)
- Re: Upstream bandwidth usage Mel Beckman (Jun 09)
- Re: Upstream bandwidth usage Brandon Jackson (Jun 09)
- RE: Upstream bandwidth usage Vasilenko Eduard via NANOG (Jun 10)
- Re: Upstream bandwidth usage Dave Bell (Jun 10)
- Re: Upstream bandwidth usage Mark Tinka (Jun 10)
- RE: Upstream bandwidth usage Vasilenko Eduard via NANOG (Jun 10)
- Re: Upstream bandwidth usage Mark Tinka (Jun 10)
- Re: Upstream bandwidth usage Jared Mauch (Jun 10)
- Re: Upstream bandwidth usage Kord Martin (Jun 10)
- Re: Upstream bandwidth usage Mark Tinka (Jun 10)
- Re: Upstream bandwidth usage Aled Morris via NANOG (Jun 10)
- Re: Upstream bandwidth usage Brandon Martin (Jun 10)
- Re: Upstream bandwidth usage Mike Hammett (Jun 10)
- Re: Upstream bandwidth usage Jay Hennigan (Jun 10)
- Re: Upstream bandwidth usage Mel Beckman (Jun 09)
- Re: Upstream bandwidth usage Mark Tinka (Jun 10)