nanog mailing list archives
Re: private 5G networks?
From: Eliot Lear <lear () lear ch>
Date: Sun, 5 Dec 2021 09:42:46 +0100
On 01.12.21 15:17, Tom Beecher wrote:
While you are correct that it's just as illegal to intentionally interfere with the unlicensed wifi bands as it is with CBRS, the difference is that the FCC and regulatory bodies are much more likely to investigate and take action against intentional interference in these frequency ranges than they would be in the unlicensed wifi bands.
And there's a practical reason for that: establishing proof of unauthorized use of a frequency is a heck of a lot easier than intentional interference. All the former requires is triangulation of the offending station. The latter requires that plus a finding of intent. It CAN happen; but more often than not what is actually found is a faulty piece of equipment that is emitting something and everything else catching a bad harmonic. There was a famous case about this in Wales in which an old television set took out a town.[1]
Eliot https://www.openreach.com/news/second-hand-tv-wipes-out-broadband-for-entire-village/
Attachment:
OpenPGP_0x87B66B46D9D27A33.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key
Attachment:
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Current thread:
- Re: private 5G networks?, (continued)
- Re: private 5G networks? Mark Tinka (Dec 06)
- RE: private 5G networks? Jean St-Laurent via NANOG (Dec 06)
- Re: private 5G networks? Mark Tinka (Dec 06)
- RE: private 5G networks? Jean St-Laurent via NANOG (Dec 06)
- Re: private 5G networks? Mark Tinka (Dec 06)
- Re: private 5G networks? Tom Beecher (Dec 06)
- RE: private 5G networks? Jean St-Laurent via NANOG (Dec 06)
- RE: private 5G networks? Jean St-Laurent via NANOG (Dec 07)
- Re: private 5G networks? Mark Tinka (Dec 07)
- Re: private 5G networks? Eliot Lear (Dec 06)
- Re: private 5G networks? Jared Mauch (Dec 06)