nanog mailing list archives
Re: SRv6
From: Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2020 13:25:49 -0700
Randy, Was meant as the reply to Aaron’s comment about VPN’s over non MPLS underlay, not the encryption of it (which is orthogonal). Cheers, Jeff On Sep 15, 2020, 12:59 PM -0700, Randy Bush <randy () psg com>, wrote:
GRE, VXLAN or any other tunneling encap of the day. As long as next-hop could be resolved behind remote endi was not aware that GRE, VXLAN (without CN103618596A), and other tunnel encaps encrypted the payload. learn something new every day. thanks!I'm still learning, but, It does seem interesting that the IP layer (v6) can now support vpn's without mpls.as the packet payload is nekkid cleartext, where is the P in vpn?
Current thread:
- Re: SRv6, (continued)
- RE: SRv6 aaron1 (Sep 15)
- Re: SRv6 Randy Bush (Sep 15)
- Re: SRv6 Mark Tinka (Sep 16)
- Re: SRv6 Anoop Ghanwani (Sep 16)
- Re: SRv6 Randy Bush (Sep 16)
- Re: SRv6 Mark Tinka (Sep 17)
- Re: SRv6 mark seery (Sep 17)
- Re: SRv6 Mark Tinka (Sep 17)
- Re: SRv6 mark seery (Sep 17)
- Re: SRv6 Mark Tinka (Sep 17)