nanog mailing list archives
Re: Devil's Advocate - Segment Routing, Why?
From: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka () seacom mu>
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2020 00:24:47 +0200
On 17/Jun/20 23:46, Tom Hill wrote:
Unsurprisingly, there would be no way on Earth that I could have said that better, so you shall find only loud cheering from over here.
Out of pure curiousity, have you deployed (or are you deploying)? Mark.
Current thread:
- Re: [c-nsp] Devil's Advocate - Segment Routing, Why?, (continued)
- Re: [c-nsp] Devil's Advocate - Segment Routing, Why? Mark Tinka (Jun 19)
- Message not available
- Re: [c-nsp] Devil's Advocate - Segment Routing, Why? Mark Tinka (Jun 20)
- Message not available
- Re: [c-nsp] Devil's Advocate - Segment Routing, Why? Mark Tinka (Jun 20)
- Re: Devil's Advocate - Segment Routing, Why? Anoop Ghanwani (Jun 19)
- Re: Devil's Advocate - Segment Routing, Why? Robert Raszuk (Jun 19)
- Re: Devil's Advocate - Segment Routing, Why? Mark Tinka (Jun 20)
- Re: Devil's Advocate - Segment Routing, Why? Sabri Berisha (Jun 20)
- Re: Devil's Advocate - Segment Routing, Why? Mark Tinka (Jun 21)
- Re: Devil's Advocate - Segment Routing, Why? Owen DeLong (Jun 20)
- Re: Devil's Advocate - Segment Routing, Why? Mark Tinka (Jun 17)
- Re: Devil's Advocate - Segment Routing, Why? Saku Ytti (Jun 17)
- Re: Devil's Advocate - Segment Routing, Why? Mark Tinka (Jun 18)
- Re: Devil's Advocate - Segment Routing, Why? Saku Ytti (Jun 18)
- Re: Devil's Advocate - Segment Routing, Why? Mark Tinka (Jun 18)