RE: Mx204 alternative

[<adamv0025 () netconsultings com>]

> From: Saku Ytti <saku () ytti fi>
> Sent: Tuesday, September 3, 2019 1:38 PM
>
> On Tue, 3 Sep 2019 at 15:10, <adamv0025 () netconsultings com> wrote:
>
> > Not true.
> > This is the case only in fixed pipelines.
>
> Also true in say MX Trio and ASR9k EZchip, I can't immediately think of
> platform where ACL or QoS costs pps. ASR9k is TCAM for ACL so O(1) and MX
> Trio is just fast enough to not affect pps performance. QoS isn't expensive at
> all in lookup terms, just expensive to have the memory.
I'm afraid I'd have to disagree. 

adam