nanog mailing list archives

Re: Mx204 alternative


From: Saku Ytti <saku () ytti fi>
Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2019 15:38:11 +0300

On Tue, 3 Sep 2019 at 15:10, <adamv0025 () netconsultings com> wrote:

Not true.
This is the case only in fixed pipelines.

Also true in say MX Trio and ASR9k EZchip, I can't immediately think
of platform where ACL or QoS costs pps. ASR9k is TCAM for ACL so O(1)
and MX Trio is just fast enough to not affect pps performance. QoS
isn't expensive at all in lookup terms, just expensive to have the
memory.

-- 
  ++ytti


Current thread: