nanog mailing list archives
Re: Mx204 alternative
From: Saku Ytti <saku () ytti fi>
Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2019 15:38:11 +0300
On Tue, 3 Sep 2019 at 15:10, <adamv0025 () netconsultings com> wrote:
Not true. This is the case only in fixed pipelines.
Also true in say MX Trio and ASR9k EZchip, I can't immediately think of platform where ACL or QoS costs pps. ASR9k is TCAM for ACL so O(1) and MX Trio is just fast enough to not affect pps performance. QoS isn't expensive at all in lookup terms, just expensive to have the memory. -- ++ytti
Current thread:
- Re: Mx204 alternative, (continued)
- Re: Mx204 alternative Brandon Martin (Sep 02)
- Re: Mx204 alternative Ross Tajvar (Sep 02)
- Re: Mx204 alternative Raymond Burkholder (Sep 02)
- Re: Mx204 alternative Olivier Benghozi (Sep 02)
- RE: Mx204 alternative adamv0025 (Sep 02)
- Re: Mx204 alternative Saku Ytti (Sep 02)
- RE: Mx204 alternative adamv0025 (Sep 02)
- Re: Mx204 alternative Ćukasz Bromirski (Sep 03)
- Re: Mx204 alternative Saku Ytti (Sep 03)
- RE: Mx204 alternative adamv0025 (Sep 03)
- Re: Mx204 alternative Saku Ytti (Sep 03)
- RE: Mx204 alternative adamv0025 (Sep 03)
- Re: Mx204 alternative Nick Hilliard (Sep 02)
- Re: Mx204 alternative Mark Tinka (Sep 02)
- RE: Mx204 alternative adamv0025 (Sep 02)
- Re: Mx204 alternative Mark Tinka (Sep 02)