Re: IPv6 Pain Experiment

[Owen DeLong <owen () delong com>]

> On Oct 7, 2019, at 23:59 , Masataka Ohta <mohta () necom830 hpcl titech ac jp> wrote:
>
> William Herrin wrote:
>
> > > I think TCPng/UDPng with 32/48 bit port numbers combined with NAT/A+P,
> > > which is obviously fully operational with existing IPv4 backbone, is
> > > better.
>
> > Not a fan of port numbers.
>
> Separation between address and port is vague.

Explain that to ICMP packets.

> > If we're going to replace TCP and UDP, initiate
> > the link with a name (e.g. dns name),
>
> The point of TCP use IP address for identification is hosts
> can confirm IP address is true by 3 way handshaking.

And UDP?

Owen