nanog mailing list archives

Re: ICMPv6 "too-big" packets ignored (filtered ?) by Cloudflare farms


From: Fernando Gont <fgont () si6networks com>
Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2019 22:43:27 -0300

On 27/2/19 07:01, Jean-Daniel Pauget wrote:
    hello,

    I confess using IPv6 behind a 6in4 tunnel because the "Business-Class" service
    of the concerned operator doesn't handle IPv6 yet.

    as such, I realised that, as far as I can figure, ICMPv6 packet "too-big" (rfc 4443)
    seem to be ignored or filtered at ~60% of ClouFlare's http farms

    as a result, random sites such as http://nanog.org/ or https://www.ansible.com/
    are badly reachable whenever small mtu are involved ...

    support@cloudflare answered me that because I'm not the owner of concerned site,
    and because of security reasons, they wouldn't investigate further.

    are there security concerns with ICMP-too-big ?

Please see: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5927

and also: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8021

Thanks,
-- 
Fernando Gont
SI6 Networks
e-mail: fgont () si6networks com
PGP Fingerprint: 6666 31C6 D484 63B2 8FB1 E3C4 AE25 0D55 1D4E 7492





Current thread: