nanog mailing list archives

Re: really amazon?

From: "Scott Christopher" <sc () ottie org>
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2019 23:13:48 +0300

Valdis Klētnieks wrote:

On Wed, 31 Jul 2019 16:36:08 -0000, Richard Williams via NANOG said:

 To contact AWS SES about spam or abuse the correct email address is abuse () amazonaws com


You know that, and I know that, but why doesn't the person at AWS whose job it
is to keep the ARIN info correct and up to date know that?


Because it will get spammed if publicly listed in WHOIS.

-- 
S.C.

Current thread:

Re: User Unknown (WAS: really amazon?), (continued)
- - - Re: User Unknown (WAS: really amazon?) Töma Gavrichenkov (Jul 31)
    - Re: User Unknown (WAS: really amazon?) Steve Pointer (Jul 31)
    - Re: User Unknown (WAS: really amazon?) Joe Provo (Jul 31)
    - Re: really amazon? Robert McKay (Jul 30)
    - Not noreply autoresponder (WAS: really amazon?) Christoffer Hansen (Jul 30)
- Re: really amazon? Christoffer Hansen (Jul 30)
  - Re: really amazon? Jay R. Ashworth (Jul 30)
- Re: really amazon? Rich Kulawiec (Jul 31)
  - Re: really amazon? Richard Williams via NANOG (Jul 31)
    - Re: really amazon? Valdis Klētnieks (Jul 31)
    - Re: really amazon? Scott Christopher (Jul 31)
    - Re: really amazon? Denys Fedoryshchenko (Jul 31)
    - Re: really amazon? Brian J. Murrell (Jul 31)
    - Re: really amazon? Stephen Satchell (Jul 31)
    - Re: really amazon? Rich Kulawiec (Jul 31)
    - Re: really amazon? Scott Christopher (Jul 31)
    - Re: really amazon? Rich Kulawiec (Jul 31)
    - Re: really amazon? Landon Stewart (Jul 31)
    - Re: really amazon? Stephen Satchell (Jul 31)