nanog mailing list archives
Re: really amazon?
From: Robert McKay <robert () mckay com>
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2019 12:56:11 +0100
On 2019-07-30 10:59, Chris Knipe wrote:
On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 11:45 AM Scott Christopher <sc () ottie org> wrote:Dan Hollis wrote:RCPT To:<email-abuse () amazon com><<< 550 #5.1.0 Address rejected. 550 5.1.1 <email-abuse () amazon com>... User unknownDATA<<< 503 #5.5.1 RCPT firstTry jeff () amazon com -- S.C.Then update your ARIN records to reflect that. Fully agree with Dan on this one.
Even if it existed it would just be an autoresponder telling you that your email wasn't read and to go resubmit the report on their website.
Maybe they should change it to noreply () amazon com. Rob
Current thread:
- Re: User Unknown (WAS: really amazon?), (continued)
- Re: User Unknown (WAS: really amazon?) Scott Christopher (Jul 31)
- Re: User Unknown (WAS: really amazon?) Sandra Murphy (Jul 31)
- Re: User Unknown (WAS: really amazon?) Scott Christopher (Jul 31)
- Re: User Unknown (WAS: really amazon?) Mark Andrews (Jul 31)
- Re: User Unknown (WAS: really amazon?) Töma Gavrichenkov (Jul 30)
- Re: User Unknown (WAS: really amazon?) Valdis Klētnieks (Jul 31)
- Re: User Unknown (WAS: really amazon?) Töma Gavrichenkov (Jul 31)
- Re: User Unknown (WAS: really amazon?) Töma Gavrichenkov (Jul 31)
- Re: User Unknown (WAS: really amazon?) Steve Pointer (Jul 31)
- Re: User Unknown (WAS: really amazon?) Joe Provo (Jul 31)
- Re: really amazon? Robert McKay (Jul 30)
- Not noreply autoresponder (WAS: really amazon?) Christoffer Hansen (Jul 30)
- Re: really amazon? Jay R. Ashworth (Jul 30)
- Re: really amazon? Richard Williams via NANOG (Jul 31)
- Re: really amazon? Valdis Klētnieks (Jul 31)
- Re: really amazon? Scott Christopher (Jul 31)
- Re: really amazon? Denys Fedoryshchenko (Jul 31)
- Re: really amazon? Brian J. Murrell (Jul 31)
- Re: really amazon? Stephen Satchell (Jul 31)