nanog mailing list archives

Re: really amazon?

From: Rich Kulawiec <rsk () gsp org>
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2019 16:46:13 -0400

On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 11:13:48PM +0300, Scott Christopher wrote:

Because it will get spammed if publicly listed in WHOIS.


Yes.  It will.  Are you telling us that Amazon, with its enormous financial
and personnel resources, doesn't have ANYBODY on staff who knows how to
properly manage an abuse@ address -- part of which includes dealing
with that exact problem?

---rsk

Current thread:

Not noreply autoresponder (WAS: really amazon?), (continued)
- - - Not noreply autoresponder (WAS: really amazon?) Christoffer Hansen (Jul 30)
- Re: really amazon? Christoffer Hansen (Jul 30)
  - Re: really amazon? Jay R. Ashworth (Jul 30)
- Re: really amazon? Rich Kulawiec (Jul 31)
  - Re: really amazon? Richard Williams via NANOG (Jul 31)
    - Re: really amazon? Valdis Klētnieks (Jul 31)
    - Re: really amazon? Scott Christopher (Jul 31)
    - Re: really amazon? Denys Fedoryshchenko (Jul 31)
    - Re: really amazon? Brian J. Murrell (Jul 31)
    - Re: really amazon? Stephen Satchell (Jul 31)
    - Re: really amazon? Rich Kulawiec (Jul 31)
    - Re: really amazon? Scott Christopher (Jul 31)
    - Re: really amazon? Rich Kulawiec (Jul 31)
    - Re: really amazon? Landon Stewart (Jul 31)
    - Re: really amazon? Stephen Satchell (Jul 31)