nanog mailing list archives

Re: 44/8


From: Owen DeLong <owen () delong com>
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2019 19:39:01 -0700



On Jul 22, 2019, at 15:33 , Michel Py <michel.py () tsisemi com> wrote:

William Herrin wrote :
The IPv6 loonies killed all IETF proposals to convert it to unicast space. It remains reserved/unusable.

+1

Fred Baker wrote :
Speaking for myself, I don't see the point. It doesn't solve anything,

As an extension of RFC1918, it would have solved the questionable and nevertheless widespread squatting of 30/8 and 
other un-announced DoD blocks because 10/8 is not big enough for some folks.

s/would/might/
s/questionable/objectionable to some/

TSI Disclaimer:  This message and any files or text attached to it are intended only for the recipients named above 
and contain information that may be confidential or privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not 
forward, copy, use or otherwise disclose this communication or the information contained herein. In the event you 
have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by replying to this message, and then 
delete all copies of it from your system. Thank you!...

Oh, please… You posted it to a public mailing list. TSI’s lawyers need a reality check.

Owen


Current thread: