nanog mailing list archives
RE: 44/8
From: Michel Py <michel.py () tsisemi com>
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2019 22:33:42 +0000
William Herrin wrote : The IPv6 loonies killed all IETF proposals to convert it to unicast space. It remains reserved/unusable.
+1
Fred Baker wrote : Speaking for myself, I don't see the point. It doesn't solve anything,
As an extension of RFC1918, it would have solved the questionable and nevertheless widespread squatting of 30/8 and other un-announced DoD blocks because 10/8 is not big enough for some folks. Michel TSI Disclaimer: This message and any files or text attached to it are intended only for the recipients named above and contain information that may be confidential or privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not forward, copy, use or otherwise disclose this communication or the information contained herein. In the event you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by replying to this message, and then delete all copies of it from your system. Thank you!...
Current thread:
- Re: 44/8, (continued)
- Ancient history (was Re: 44/8) David Conrad (Jul 24)
- Re: Ancient history (was Re: 44/8) William Herrin (Jul 24)
- RE: 44/8 Michel Py (Jul 22)
- RE: 44/8 Jerry Cloe (Jul 22)
- Re: 44/8 Ca By (Jul 22)
- RE: 44/8 Michel Py (Jul 22)
- Re: 44/8 Hansen, Christoffer (Jul 24)
- Re: 44/8 Owen DeLong (Jul 22)
- Re: 44/8 Matt Hoppes (Jul 22)
- RE: 44/8 Naslund, Steve (Jul 22)
- Re: 44/8 Stephen Satchell (Jul 22)
- Re: 44/8 Owen DeLong (Jul 22)
- 240/4 (Re: 44/8) Mikael Abrahamsson (Jul 22)