nanog mailing list archives
Re: 240/4 (Re: 44/8)
From: Greg Skinner via NANOG <nanog () nanog org>
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2019 14:41:04 -0700
On Jul 22, 2019, at 9:15 PM, Ross Tajvar <ross () tajvar io> wrote:Editor's note: This draft has not been submitted to any formal process. It may change significantly if it is ever submitted. You are reading it because we trust you and we value your opinions. *Please do not recirculate it.* Please join us in testing patches and equipment!(emphasis mine) Interesting choice to host it in a public Github repo, then...
Funny, that … BTW, there are a few missing links in the References that some of you may find useful: [IEN48] Cerf, V., "The CATENET MODEL FOR INTERNETWORKING", 1978, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/ien/ien48.txt> [IETF-13] Gross, P., Bowers, K., "IETF Proceedings", 1989, <https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/13.pdf> [IHML] Many, T., "Internet History Mailing list", 2019, <http://www.postel.org/internet-history/> Dave Täht and John Gilmore raised issues discussed in the draft in the February 2019 <http://mailman.postel.org/pipermail/internet-history/2019-February/thread.html> and March 2019 <http://mailman.postel.org/pipermail/internet-history/2019-March/thread.html> internet-history list archives, respectively. FWIW, here are some additional resources: IPv4 Unicast Extensions Netdevconf preso, March 2019 <http://flent-newark.bufferbloat.net/~d/IPv4%20Unicast%20Extensions3.pdf> The IPv4 Cleanup Project GitHub repo <https://github.com/dtaht/unicast-extensions> —gregbo
Current thread:
- Re: 44/8, (continued)
- RE: 44/8 Naslund, Steve (Jul 22)
- Re: 44/8 Stephen Satchell (Jul 22)
- Re: 44/8 Owen DeLong (Jul 22)
- 240/4 (Re: 44/8) Mikael Abrahamsson (Jul 22)
- Re: 240/4 (Re: 44/8) Owen DeLong (Jul 22)
- Re: 240/4 (Re: 44/8) George Herbert (Jul 22)
- Re: 240/4 (Re: 44/8) Ross Tajvar (Jul 22)
- Re: 240/4 (Re: 44/8) Greg Skinner via NANOG (Jul 26)
- Feasibility of using Class E space for public unicast (was re: 44/8) Doug Barton (Jul 26)
- Re: Feasibility of using Class E space for public unicast (was re: 44/8) William Herrin (Jul 26)
- Re: Feasibility of using Class E space for public unicast (was re: 44/8) Doug Barton (Jul 26)
- Re: Feasibility of using Class E space for public unicast (was re: 44/8) William Herrin (Jul 26)
- Re: Feasibility of using Class E space for public unicast (was re: 44/8) Doug Barton (Jul 27)
- Feasibility of using Class E space for public unicast (was re: 44/8) bzs (Jul 27)
- Re: Feasibility of using Class E space for public unicast (was re: 44/8) johnl (Jul 27)
- Re: Feasibility of using Class E space for public unicast (was re: 44/8) Randy Bush (Jul 27)
- Re: Feasibility of using Class E space for public unicast (was re: 44/8) Stephen Satchell (Jul 27)
- Re: 44/8 John Curran (Jul 22)