nanog mailing list archives
Re: 44/8
From: John Curran <jcurran () arin net>
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2019 15:41:33 +0000
On 19 Jul 2019, at 11:34 AM, Matt Harris <matt () netfire net<mailto:matt () netfire net>> wrote: On Fri, Jul 19, 2019 at 10:29 AM John Curran <jcurran () arin net<mailto:jcurran () arin net>> wrote: Matt - Chris is correct. Those who received IPv4 address blocks by InterNIC (or its predecessors) prior to the inception of ARIN on 22 December 1997 are legacy resource holders, and continue to receive those same registry services for those blocks (Whois, reverse DNS, ability to update) without any need for an agreement with ARIN. This has been provided without any fee to the original registrants (or their legal successors) as recognition of their contributions to the early Internet. Hey John, I understand that, however my understanding is that the establishment of an ARIN RSA is required prior to the transfer of a block or a portion or a block via ARIN (such as the transfer of 44.192/10). Thus, this would mean that the 44/8 block is now governed by an (well, more than one, now that it's split) ARIN RSA (or LRSA) whereas it was not before. Is that not correct? Matt - ARIN doesn’t discuss details of specific registrations publicly; you need to refer any such questions to the registrant. /John John Curran President and CEO American Registry for Internet Numbers
Current thread:
- Re: 44/8, (continued)
- Re: 44/8 Matt Harris (Jul 19)
- Re: 44/8 Christopher Morrow (Jul 19)
- Re: 44/8 John Curran (Jul 19)
- Re: 44/8 Matt Harris (Jul 19)
- Re: 44/8 John Curran (Jul 19)
- Re: 44/8 Matt Harris (Jul 19)
- Re: 44/8 John Curran (Jul 19)
- Re: 44/8 Owen DeLong (Jul 19)
- Re: 44/8 William Herrin (Jul 19)
- Re: 44/8 Jay R. Ashworth (Jul 20)
- Re: 44/8 William Herrin (Jul 21)
- Re: 44/8 Aled Morris via NANOG (Jul 21)
- Re: 44/8 Sabri Berisha (Jul 21)
- Re: 44/8 Owen DeLong (Jul 22)
- Re: 44/8 Sabri Berisha (Jul 22)