nanog mailing list archives
Re: yet another round of SMTP Over TLS on Port 26 - Implicit TLS Proposal [Feedback Request]
From: valdis.kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2019 18:46:46 -0500
On Sun, 13 Jan 2019 04:57:26 +0530, Viruthagiri Thirumavalavan said:
Guys, I can't able to disclose my work at this point. But I'm happy to publish my work again next month. In the meantime, I have no issues if you all think my work is bad.
You'd probably do the world a favor if you spent that month instead finding mail software that does quoting and attribution correctly. You've made several posts that quoted me, and then quoted others in such a way that it looked like I said it.
But if you all think, my work has some novelty and this man made the wrong choice, be sure to tell that too.
Note that there are far more bad ideas than good ones, and sheer novelty doesn't mean an idea is good.
Current thread:
- Re: Enough port 26 talk..., (continued)
- Re: Enough port 26 talk... John Levine (Jan 13)
- Message not available
- Re: the e-mail of the future is the e-mail oft the past, was Enough port 26 talk... John R. Levine (Jan 14)
- Re: the e-mail of the future is the e-mail oft the past, was Enough port 26 talk... Miles Fidelman (Jan 14)
- Re: the e-mail of the future is the e-mail oft the past, was Enough port 26 talk... Bjørn Mork (Jan 15)
- Re: the e-mail of the future is the e-mail oft the past, was Enough port 26 talk... Stephen Satchell (Jan 15)
- Re: the e-mail of the future is the e-mail oft the past, was Enough port 26 talk... Tei (Jan 15)
- Re: the e-mail of the future is the e-mail oft the past, was Enough port 26 talk... James Downs (Jan 15)
- RE: the e-mail of the future is the e-mail oft the past, was Enough port 26 talk... Keith Medcalf (Jan 15)
- Re: the e-mail of the future is the e-mail oft the past, was Enough port 26 talk... Grant Taylor via NANOG (Jan 15)
- Re: yet another round of SMTP Over TLS on Port 26 - Implicit TLS Proposal [Feedback Request] Viruthagiri Thirumavalavan (Jan 12)
- Re: yet another round of SMTP Over TLS on Port 26 - Implicit TLS Proposal [Feedback Request] valdis . kletnieks (Jan 12)
- Re: yet another round of SMTP Over TLS on Port 26 - Implicit TLS Proposal [Feedback Request] Viruthagiri Thirumavalavan (Jan 12)
- Re: yet another round of SMTP Over TLS on Port 26 - Implicit TLS Proposal [Feedback Request] Ross Tajvar (Jan 12)
- Re: yet another round of SMTP Over TLS on Port 26 - Implicit TLS Proposal [Feedback Request] Viruthagiri Thirumavalavan (Jan 12)
- Re: yet another round of SMTP Over TLS on Port 26 - Implicit TLS Proposal [Feedback Request] valdis . kletnieks (Jan 12)
- Re: SMTP Over TLS on Port 26 - Implicit TLS Proposal [Feedback Request] Viruthagiri Thirumavalavan (Jan 12)
- Re: SMTP Over TLS on Port 26 - Implicit TLS Proposal [Feedback Request] Viruthagiri Thirumavalavan (Jan 13)
- Re: SMTP Over TLS on Port 26 - Implicit TLS Proposal [Feedback Request] William Anderson (Jan 14)