Re: Packetstream - how does this not violate just about every provider's ToS?

["Anne P. Mitchell, Esq." <amitchell () isipp com>]

> On Apr 26, 2019, at 6:10 AM, Matthew Kaufman <matthew () matthew at> wrote:
>
> So providers should stamp this out (because it is “bad”) and support customers who are running TOR nodes (because 
> those are “good”). Did I get that right?

If that is how you see it, then it's right for you.  At no time did I mention TOR, nor will I get dragged into that 
discussion.

Anne

Attorney at Law
GDPR, CCPA (CA) & CCDPA (CO) Compliance Consultant
Author: Section 6 of the CAN-SPAM Act of 2003 (the Federal anti-spam law)
Legislative Consultant
CEO/President, Institute for Social Internet Public Policy
Board of Directors, Denver Internet Exchange
Board of Directors, Asilomar Microcomputer Workshop
Legal Counsel: The CyberGreen Institute
Former Counsel: Mail Abuse Prevention System (MAPS
California Bar Association
Cal. Bar Cyberspace Law Committee
Colorado Cyber Committee
Ret. Professor of Law, Lincoln Law School of San Jose