Re: RPKI publication

["Jeff McAdams" <jeffm () iglou com>]

On Fri, November 23, 2018 18:20, Christopher Morrow wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 23, 2018 at 6:12 PM Jeff McAdams <jeffm () iglou com> wrote:
> > On November 23, 2018 4:48:14 PM EST, Christopher Morrow <
> > morrowc.lists () gmail com> wrote:
> >
> > > I think there are 3 options:
> > > ripe validator v2 (potentially v3?) -
> > > https://github.com/RIPE-NCC/rpki-validator
> > >
> > >
> > > https://github.com/RIPE-NCC/rpki-validator-3
> > > rpki.net validator - https://github.com/dragonresearch/rpki.net bbn
> > > rpstir - https://github.com/bgpsecurity/rpstir
> >
> > Like I said, validation and caching, "relying party", has several
> > options...several of which are relatively easy to run and manage.  It's
> > the CA and publishing for which no really good options (that I've found,
> > at least) are available currently.
>
> the ca bits do exist in rpki.net's software set... they are a tad fiddly
> to setup/run though, yes.

Oops, sorry, I missed the rpki.net reference in there (I read and replied
to that message from my phone).

Yes, I spent several hours trying to even get the Ubuntu 18.04 packages to
even install without errors.  I'm not particularly keen on installing a 2
1/2 year old distro to run no-longer-supported version of the django
framework to support this, so I'm pretty much putting into the "not
reasonably current and maintained" category.

-- 
Jeff