nanog mailing list archives
Re: RPKI publication
From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists () gmail com>
Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2018 18:20:14 -0500
On Fri, Nov 23, 2018 at 6:12 PM Jeff McAdams <jeffm () iglou com> wrote:
On November 23, 2018 4:48:14 PM EST, Christopher Morrow < morrowc.lists () gmail com> wrote:I think there are 3 options: ripe validator v2 (potentially v3?) - https://github.com/RIPE-NCC/rpki-validator https://github.com/RIPE-NCC/rpki-validator-3 rpki.net validator - https://github.com/dragonresearch/rpki.net bbn rpstir - https://github.com/bgpsecurity/rpstirLike I said, validation and caching, "relying party", has several options...several of which are relatively easy to run and manage. It's the CA and publishing for which no really good options (that I've found, at least) are available currently.
the ca bits do exist in rpki.net's software set... they are a tad fiddly to setup/run though, yes.
Current thread:
- RPKI publication Jeff McAdams (Nov 23)
- Re: RPKI publication Alex Band (Nov 23)
- Re: RPKI publication Christopher Morrow (Nov 23)
- Re: RPKI publication Jeff McAdams (Nov 23)
- Re: RPKI publication Christopher Morrow (Nov 23)
- Re: RPKI publication Jeff McAdams (Nov 23)
- Re: RPKI publication Michael Gehrmann (Nov 26)
- Re: RPKI publication Jeff McAdams (Nov 25)
- Re: RPKI publication Christopher Morrow (Nov 23)
- Re: RPKI publication Alex Band (Nov 23)