nanog mailing list archives
Re: IGP protocol
From: Saku Ytti <saku () ytti fi>
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2018 17:30:41 +0200
On Tue, 13 Nov 2018 at 16:27, Alain Hebert <ahebert () pubnix net> wrote:
For those that got involved in fixing a network that goes down due to OSPF spoofed packets... (Before OSPFv2|3) + Security for IS-IS
Do you know connected host can't talk ISIS to you? ISIS is false security. In modern platforms OSPF almost always can be protected (iACL), ISIS in many times cannot. I'd run MD5 in either case. -- ++ytti
Current thread:
- Re: IGP protocol, (continued)
- Re: IGP protocol Aled Morris via NANOG (Nov 13)
- Re: IGP protocol Tashi Phuntsho (Nov 14)
- Re: IGP protocol Mark Tinka (Nov 13)
- Re: IGP protocol Mark Tinka (Nov 13)
- Re: IGP protocol Saku Ytti (Nov 13)
- Re: IGP protocol James Bensley (Nov 14)
- Re: IGP protocol Baldur Norddahl (Nov 14)
- SV: IGP protocol Gustav Ulander (Nov 14)
- Re: IGP protocol James Bensley (Nov 15)
- Re: IGP protocol Saku Ytti (Nov 13)
- Re: IGP protocol Saku Ytti (Nov 13)
- Re: IGP protocol Mark Tinka (Nov 18)
- Re: IGP protocol Saku Ytti (Nov 18)
- Re: IGP protocol Alfie Pates (Nov 18)
- Re: IGP protocol Saku Ytti (Nov 18)
- Re: IGP protocol Nick Hilliard (Nov 18)
- Re: IGP protocol Mark Tinka (Nov 18)