nanog mailing list archives
Re: IGP protocol
From: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka () seacom mu>
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2018 12:44:27 +0200
On 13/Nov/18 07:52, Brandon Martin wrote:
I was of the impression that there was a draft or similar for single-topology (IPv4+IPv6) OSPF. Did anything ever come of that?
Multiple Address Families in OSPFv3. But NLRI is conveyed over IPv6, even for IPv4. First saw it in Junos 9, way back when. Mark.
Current thread:
- Re: IGP protocol, (continued)
- Re: IGP protocol Mikael Abrahamsson (Nov 12)
- Re: IGP protocol Jared Mauch (Nov 12)
- Re: IGP protocol Ryan Kearney via NANOG (Nov 12)
- RE: IGP protocol Naslund, Steve (Nov 12)
- Re: IGP protocol valdis . kletnieks (Nov 12)
- RE: IGP protocol Naslund, Steve (Nov 12)
- Re: IGP protocol Job Snijders (Nov 12)
- Re: IGP protocol Brandon Martin (Nov 12)
- Re: IGP protocol Aled Morris via NANOG (Nov 13)
- Re: IGP protocol Tashi Phuntsho (Nov 14)
- Re: IGP protocol Mark Tinka (Nov 13)
- Re: IGP protocol valdis . kletnieks (Nov 12)
- Re: IGP protocol Mark Tinka (Nov 13)
- Re: IGP protocol Saku Ytti (Nov 13)
- Re: IGP protocol James Bensley (Nov 14)
- Re: IGP protocol Baldur Norddahl (Nov 14)
- SV: IGP protocol Gustav Ulander (Nov 14)
- Re: IGP protocol James Bensley (Nov 15)
- Re: IGP protocol Saku Ytti (Nov 13)
- Re: IGP protocol Saku Ytti (Nov 13)
- Re: IGP protocol Mark Tinka (Nov 18)
- Re: IGP protocol Saku Ytti (Nov 18)