nanog mailing list archives

Re: IGP protocol

From: Alfie Pates <alfie@fdx.services>
Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2018 10:12:27 +0000

or MacSec


There's a school of thought which suggests MD5 security on single-hop BGP is absolute theatre with no security benefit 
and that MACsec is the route you should be taking. 

~ a

Current thread:

Re: IGP protocol, (continued)
- Re: IGP protocol Mark Tinka (Nov 13)
  - Re: IGP protocol Saku Ytti (Nov 13)
    - Re: IGP protocol James Bensley (Nov 14)
    - Re: IGP protocol Baldur Norddahl (Nov 14)
    - SV: IGP protocol Gustav Ulander (Nov 14)
    - Re: IGP protocol James Bensley (Nov 15)
  - Re: IGP protocol Alain Hebert (Nov 13)
    - Re: IGP protocol Saku Ytti (Nov 13)
    - Re: IGP protocol Mark Tinka (Nov 18)
    - Re: IGP protocol Saku Ytti (Nov 18)
    - Re: IGP protocol Alfie Pates (Nov 18)
    - Re: IGP protocol Saku Ytti (Nov 18)
    - Re: IGP protocol Nick Hilliard (Nov 18)
    - Re: IGP protocol Mark Tinka (Nov 18)
    - Re: IGP protocol Grant Taylor via NANOG (Nov 18)
    - Re: IGP protocol Saku Ytti (Nov 18)
    - Re: IGP protocol Mark Tinka (Nov 18)
    - Re: IGP protocol Saku Ytti (Nov 18)
    - Re: IGP protocol Mark Tinka (Nov 19)
- Re: IGP protocol im (Nov 14)
  - Re: IGP protocol Mark Tinka (Nov 18)

(Thread continues...)