nanog mailing list archives

Re: Non-profit IX vs. neutral for-profit IX


From: Darin Steffl <darin.steffl () mnwifi com>
Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2018 08:34:32 -0600

http://micemn.net/services.html

MICE in Minneapolis is a great IX that we are on and their port fees are
very reasonable. They used to be completely free up until this year. Even
so, their fees are virtually nothing which encourages more operators to
connect to it versus For-Profit IX's where sometimes the fees are almost as
much as transit.

For example Midwest-IX is $9,300 per year for a 10G port but MICE is only
$250 per year. That's a HUGE difference and MICE also has way more peers
and traffic overall due to how easy and cheap it is to join.

On Fri, Dec 21, 2018 at 8:27 AM Mike Hammett <nanog () ics-il net> wrote:

Not all transit is cheap and not all transit is good quality, regardless
of what it costs. ;-)

At our IX, we regularly see clients whose total network usage goes up once
they're on the IX.



-----
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/>
<https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL>
<https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb>
<https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions>
<https://twitter.com/ICSIL>
Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/>
<https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix>
<https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange>
<https://twitter.com/mdwestix>
The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/>
<https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp>
<https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg>
------------------------------
*From: *"Mehmet Akcin" <mehmet () akcin net>
*To: *"Clayton Zekelman" <clayton () mnsi net>
*Cc: *"Mike Hammett" <nanog () ics-il net>, "NANOG Mailing List" <
nanog () nanog org>, "Tim Raphael" <raphael.timothy () gmail com>
*Sent: *Friday, December 21, 2018 8:19:43 AM
*Subject: *Re: Non-profit IX vs. neutral for-profit IX

Torix and Six are great examples.

If you want to be for profit, make sure to publish port pricing and keep
it fair. Transit is cheap and good quality

On Fri, Dec 21, 2018 at 08:14 Clayton Zekelman <clayton () mnsi net> wrote:


TorIX is a great example of a not for profit IX that is very successful.

https://www.torix.ca/

A very dedicated team of people provide an incredible level of service.

Thave a very transparent process.  Their pricing is listed up front on
their website:

https://www.torix.ca/peering/#pricing



At 09:03 AM 21/12/2018, Mike Hammett wrote:

As far as neutral, I meant separate from the datacenters in which they're
housed. People in NA seem to think there are only two kinds of IXes,
Equinix, DRT, Coresite types and NWAX, SIX, MICE types.



-----
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/>

Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/>

The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/>

------------------------------
*From: *"Tim Raphael" <raphael.timothy () gmail com>
*To: *"NANOG Mailing List" <nanog () nanog org>
*Sent: *Thursday, December 20, 2018 8:39:42 PM
*Subject: *Re: Non-profit IX vs. neutral for-profit IX

The other point to consider is that a NFP can justify more locations and
offer services (such as extended reach) that don’t have the same profit
margins or ROI as for-profits.
This often leads to greater value to those with smaller networks and
fewer customers allowing them to grow and expand without increased
aggregation or transit costs. This in-turn leads to a richer array of
providers and chips away at the monopolies in niche markets.

The NFP IXP I work for focuses on providing value to the broader
community and the Internet as a whole - especially somewhere like Australia
which has unique constraints.

Additionally, “Neutral†and For-Profit doesn’t always compute in my
mind, there will always be commercial alliances that lead to not-total
neutrality.
When a NFP is owned by it’s members there has to be 100% transparency
in organisational decisions around member funds and resources which ensures
accountability reliability.



- Tim


On 21 Dec 2018, at 3:58 am, Brielle Bruns <bruns () 2mbit com> wrote:

On 12/20/2018 12:51 PM, Aaron wrote:
Probably price.  Also perception of value.  If you're a for profit
enterprise then they're paying for interconnection plus your bump.  If
you're non-profit the perception is that there is a larger value because
there's no bump.  Whether that's true or not, who knows but that's the
perception I've heard.

Depending on the size of the non-profit, I'd almost compare it to how
the hospitals are here in Boise.

The non-profits are oversized, monopolistic, price gouging, etc.  Their
care can be pretty meh, esp since they bought up all the little independent
clinics (yay, ER pricing for a basic family clinic visit).

The for-profit smaller clinics and hospitals run a pretty tight ship,
better value for their money, service is very good, and compete with one
another for who has the best service.

People think they are getting 'better' because they are going to a
place that is supposed to be run to benefit people over profit, but alas,
you'd be very very wrong.
--
Brielle Bruns
The Summit Open Source Development Group
http://www.sosdg.org     /     http://www.ahbl.org



--

Clayton Zekelman
Managed Network Systems Inc. (MNSi)
3363 Tecumseh Rd. E
<https://maps.google.com/?q=3363+Tecumseh+Rd.+E+%0D%0AWindsor,+Ontario+%0D%0AN8W+1H4&entry=gmail&source=g>
Windsor, Ontario
<https://maps.google.com/?q=3363+Tecumseh+Rd.+E+%0D%0AWindsor,+Ontario+%0D%0AN8W+1H4&entry=gmail&source=g>
N8W 1H4
<https://maps.google.com/?q=3363+Tecumseh+Rd.+E+%0D%0AWindsor,+Ontario+%0D%0AN8W+1H4&entry=gmail&source=g>

tel. 519-985-8410
fax. 519-985-8409

--
Mehmet
+1-424-298-1903



-- 
Darin Steffl
Minnesota WiFi
www.mnwifi.com
507-634-WiFi
<http://www.facebook.com/minnesotawifi> Like us on Facebook
<http://www.facebook.com/minnesotawifi>

Current thread: