nanog mailing list archives
Re: Non-profit IX vs. neutral for-profit IX
From: "Constantine A. Murenin" <mureninc () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2018 13:53:03 -0600
On Thu, 20 Dec 2018 at 13:44, Mike Hammett <nanog () ics-il net> wrote:
What are your thoughts on why a network would join a non-profit IX, but not a neutral, for-profit IX? Let's assume that traffic levels are similar.
But are traffic levels actually similar? Most areas have one or the other dominating the field, so, which one you join usually depends on other (more pressing) factors. C.
Current thread:
- Re: Non-profit IX vs. neutral for-profit IX, (continued)
- Re: Non-profit IX vs. neutral for-profit IX Mike Hammett (Dec 21)
- Message not available
- Re: Non-profit IX vs. neutral for-profit IX Clayton Zekelman (Dec 21)
- Re: Non-profit IX vs. neutral for-profit IX Mehmet Akcin (Dec 21)
- Re: Non-profit IX vs. neutral for-profit IX Mike Hammett (Dec 21)
- Re: Non-profit IX vs. neutral for-profit IX Darin Steffl (Dec 21)
- Re: Non-profit IX vs. neutral for-profit IX Mike Hammett (Dec 21)
- Re: Non-profit IX vs. neutral for-profit IX Jay Hanke (Dec 21)
- RE: Non-profit IX vs. neutral for-profit IX Robert DeVita (Dec 21)
- Re: Non-profit IX vs. neutral for-profit IX Mike Hammett (Dec 21)
- Re: Non-profit IX vs. neutral for-profit IX Jason Lixfeld (Dec 21)