nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 Loopback/Point-to-Point address allocation
From: Nikolay Shopik <shopik+lists () nvcube net>
Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2017 10:35:15 +0300
On 10/09/2017 14:25, Saku Ytti wrote:
However I don't think market would generally appreciate the implications linklocal brings to traceroute, where least bad option would be just to originate hop-limit exceeded from loop0, with no visibility on actual interface.
rfc5837 would help but it seems market universally ignore it for some reason unknown to me (lack of interest and IPv6 adoption?)
We find LL is simpler, operation wise at some cases.
Current thread:
- Re: IPv6 Loopback/Point-to-Point address allocation, (continued)
- Re: IPv6 Loopback/Point-to-Point address allocation Baldur Norddahl (Sep 09)
- Re: IPv6 Loopback/Point-to-Point address allocation Nick Hilliard (Sep 10)
- Re: IPv6 Loopback/Point-to-Point address allocation Enno Rey (Sep 10)
- Re: IPv6 Loopback/Point-to-Point address allocation Job Snijders (Sep 10)
- Re: IPv6 Loopback/Point-to-Point address allocation Enno Rey (Sep 10)
- Re: IPv6 Loopback/Point-to-Point address allocation Enno Rey (Sep 10)
- Re: IPv6 Loopback/Point-to-Point address allocation sthaug (Sep 10)
- Re: IPv6 Loopback/Point-to-Point address allocation Nick Hilliard (Sep 10)
- Re: IPv6 Loopback/Point-to-Point address allocation Baldur Norddahl (Sep 09)
- Re: IPv6 Loopback/Point-to-Point address allocation Saku Ytti (Sep 10)
- Re: IPv6 Loopback/Point-to-Point address allocation Enno Rey (Sep 10)
- Re: IPv6 Loopback/Point-to-Point address allocation Nikolay Shopik (Sep 11)
- Re: IPv6 Loopback/Point-to-Point address allocation Owen DeLong (Sep 11)
- Message not available
- Re: IPv6 Loopback/Point-to-Point address allocation Owen DeLong (Sep 15)
- Re: IPv6 Loopback/Point-to-Point address allocation Saku Ytti (Sep 12)