nanog mailing list archives
Re: 2017 NANOG Elections General Information
From: Dave Temkin <dave () temk in>
Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2017 08:36:49 -0700
On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 12:32 AM, Bill Woodcock <woody () pch net> wrote:
On Sep 7, 2017, at 11:26 PM, Randy Bush <randy () psg com> wrote: my impression is that, in recent years, one has to be a white frat boy who is proud of being drunk.One of those rare occasions when Randy and I are in complete agreement.
So how do we fix it? As usual, that part is missed. Easier to snipe, not so easy to act.
On Sep 10, 2017, at 1:59 PM, Bryan Holloway <bryan () shout net> wrote: I point specifically to the opening talk at Bellevue where there werewackily photoshop'd pictures of NANOG star heavy-hitters.Had I been a first-time attendee, I would've felt like a high-schoolfreshman being told who all the "cool seniors" were.Frankly, it was awkward and off-putting.Probably a safe bet that it was mostly aspirant juniors. To my occasional observation, the cool seniors don't attend anymore. Unless Stephen Stuart or Sean Doran or John Hawkinson showed up. Which would surprise me very much.
I didn't like that opening, at all. I disliked it slightly less than when they had a video making fun of us. I personally and in my Board position thank NTT for sponsoring our events, and we give them, like all other hosts, a few minutes during the opening to do something that they think attendees will find educational and/or entertaining. I, like you, sincerely hate the inside jokes being tossed around from the stage and gave them my personal feedback as such. They are far from the only sponsor to have done so, and if you really feel that it's causing a hostile environment for newcomers, I suggest you speak up about it on the members list so that we can figure out the best way to fix it. With that said, newcomers may feel this moment of awkwardness during the opening, but we go above and beyond afterwards to make them feel welcome (newcomers lunch with a personal shepherd, etc.) that I hope at least has made up for some of it in the past. I won't sit around and mourn the greybeards that choose or don't choose to show up. We can't go chasing after people who have had vast changes in their career responsibilities and life circumstances and assume that we can always produce the conference that fits their aspirations. At some point we need to hand the torch over to the next guard, and that's the root of my diversity screed. If we try to be everything to everyone, we end up as nothing to no one (or worse, ITW). The board has been nothing but receptive towards ideas on how to make these meetings more valuable to long time and first time attendees alike. -Dave Temkin NANOG Board Chair
Current thread:
- Re: 2017 NANOG Elections General Information Dave Temkin (Sep 05)
- Re: 2017 NANOG Elections General Information Robert Brockway (Sep 14)
- Re: 2017 NANOG Elections General Information Dave Temkin (Sep 07)
- Re: 2017 NANOG Elections General Information Randy Bush (Sep 07)
- Re: 2017 NANOG Elections General Information Daniel Golding (Sep 08)
- Re: 2017 NANOG Elections General Information Bryan Holloway (Sep 10)
- Re: 2017 NANOG Elections General Information Bill Woodcock (Sep 11)
- Re: 2017 NANOG Elections General Information Dave Temkin (Sep 11)
- Re: 2017 NANOG Elections General Information Randy Bush (Sep 12)
- Re: 2017 NANOG Elections General Information Dave Temkin (Sep 13)
- Re: 2017 NANOG Elections General Information Mike Hughes (Sep 15)
- Re: 2017 NANOG Elections General Information Dave Temkin (Sep 07)
- Re: 2017 NANOG Elections General Information Robert Brockway (Sep 14)
- Re: 2017 NANOG Elections General Information Bill Woodcock (Sep 12)
- Re: 2017 NANOG Elections General Information Dave Temkin (Sep 12)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: 2017 NANOG Elections General Information courtneysmith (Sep 06)
- Re: 2017 NANOG Elections General Information Steve Feldman (Sep 06)
- Re: 2017 NANOG Elections General Information Scott Weeks (Sep 10)
- Re: 2017 NANOG Elections General Information Ken Matlock (Sep 10)