nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 Loopback/Point-to-Point address allocation
From: Saku Ytti <saku () ytti fi>
Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2017 10:52:58 +0300
On 12 September 2017 at 01:08, Lee Howard <lee () asgard org> wrote:
Are any of you currently running IPv6 and wished you had done something differently during the planning phase that may have prevented headaches down the road?I always tell people: you’re going to rewrite your address plan three times. Do what you can with it, then start deploying through the network. You’ll see what changes you need to make once you know how your network is unique.
Also write your iACL/edge-filter before you deploy your IPv6. If you can't write concise, almost static IPv6 iACL, your numbering plan requires work. -- ++ytti
Current thread:
- Re: IPv6 Loopback/Point-to-Point address allocation, (continued)
- Re: IPv6 Loopback/Point-to-Point address allocation sthaug (Sep 10)
- Re: IPv6 Loopback/Point-to-Point address allocation Thomas Bellman (Sep 10)
- Re: IPv6 Loopback/Point-to-Point address allocation Saku Ytti (Sep 10)
- Re: IPv6 Loopback/Point-to-Point address allocation Enno Rey (Sep 10)
- Re: IPv6 Loopback/Point-to-Point address allocation Nikolay Shopik (Sep 11)
- Re: IPv6 Loopback/Point-to-Point address allocation Owen DeLong (Sep 11)
- Message not available
- Re: IPv6 Loopback/Point-to-Point address allocation Owen DeLong (Sep 15)
- Re: IPv6 Loopback/Point-to-Point address allocation Saku Ytti (Sep 12)