nanog mailing list archives

Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too

From: Lyndon Nerenberg <lyndon () orthanc ca>
Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2017 19:32:24 -0800

On Dec 28, 2017, at 7:28 PM, Tony Wicks <tony () wicks co nz> wrote:

I think its time you all had a bit of a holiday break and stopped thinking
of IP networking for a little while, Just saying.......


Nah.  This is a useful conversation (and argument) to have.

Current thread:

Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too, (continued)
- - - Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too Mark Andrews (Dec 28)
    - Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too Ricky Beam (Dec 28)
    - Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too William Herrin (Dec 28)
    - Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too Mark Andrews (Dec 28)
    - Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too Owen DeLong (Dec 28)
    - Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too Ricky Beam (Dec 28)
    - RE: Waste will kill ipv6 too Keith Medcalf (Dec 28)
    - Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too Mark Andrews (Dec 28)
    - Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too Lyndon Nerenberg (Dec 28)
    - RE: Waste will kill ipv6 too Tony Wicks (Dec 28)
    - Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too Lyndon Nerenberg (Dec 28)
    - RE: Waste will kill ipv6 too Chuck Church (Dec 28)
    - Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too Michael Crapse (Dec 28)
    - Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too valdis . kletnieks (Dec 28)
    - Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too valdis . kletnieks (Dec 28)
    - Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too Lyndon Nerenberg (Dec 28)
    - Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too Owen DeLong (Dec 29)
    - Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too John Lightfoot (Dec 29)
    - Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too Mel Beckman (Dec 29)
    - Re: Assigning /64 but using /127 (was Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too) Octavio Alvarez (Dec 28)
    - Re: Assigning /64 but using /127 (was Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too) JORDI PALET MARTINEZ (Dec 28)

(Thread continues...)